Friday, November 6, 2015

Looking into the'Shadows' of Banking system



What is shadow banking? 
The term “Shadow Banking was coined by McCulley  in the year 2007.Pozsar and Adrian and Shin presented articles  the first articles on Shadow Banking.
   
The shadow banking system is similar to the traditional banking system but the range of activities, mirror each other. Shadow banks simply take the credit intermediation process of traditional banks and separate it into its constituent steps. As an example, a normal process for a bank might be to gather deposits, originate loans, package a pool of loans into an asset-backed security, and sell the security to an investor. The same process when occurred within the shadow banking system might require mul­tiple specialized firms each performing a different function.
From a risk perspective, the traditional and shadow banking systems differ in 3 key areas.
1 .Shadow banks do not hold deposits – Traditional banks have the benefit of being able to fund their activities using their own deposit base. These are also insured, making them highly stable. Since shadow banks are not depository institutions, they primarily tap short-term wholesale funding markets.
2. Shadow banks do not have access to deposit insurance or central bank liquidity – Since shadow banks do not hold deposits, insurance is generally moot. However, unlike traditional banks, if shadow banks run into funding troubles, they do not have access to emergency lending facilities from their central banks.
  3. Shadow banks are not subject to the same degree of regulation – In compensation for deposit insurance and emergency central bank support, traditional banks are subject to a wide variety of regulations including minimum standards for lending, capital and liquidity buffers, limits on leverage, and ongoing monitoring by regulators. In contrast, shadow banks are subject to a much flexible set of rules and less monitoring, if at all.

No comments:

Post a Comment